🔗 Share this article

When the Russian President traveled to the South Asian nation four years ago, the international order was markedly different. That short trip, curtailed by the global health crisis, centered around discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era came before a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by inflammatory statements and the introduction of substantial trade tariffs.

"In this context, the significance of this diplomatic mission to meet Modi cannot be overstated, serving as a signal of resilient relations and a defiance of outside coercion," experts emphasize.

A Pivotal Moment for Both Nations

The summit takes place at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader arrives after rejecting recent peace proposals for Ukraine, bolstered by claimed advances by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the key significance of this engagement is its very occurrence," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to a form of routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the risks are particularly elevated. The country navigates a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats published a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This elicited a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable interference.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond originates from the Soviet period and remains firmly rooted, with Moscow long being Delhi's top arms provider. This alliance was largely tolerated by the West before a recent shift.

For years, Western nations ignored India's large-scale buying of cheap energy from Russia. Yet, recently failed peace efforts, pressure mounted, leading to economic penalties and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"In response, India has returned to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," explained a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the situation unfolds."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "Beijing remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst added.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an excessively close bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from a dominant share to under 40% in recent years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but avoid overly reliant that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

The Oil Question

Enhanced trade relations is likely to be a key agenda item. The Russian leader has publicly stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", defying Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil purchases is central. While the Indian government has vowed to continue buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the private sector. At the same time, India has agreed to increase imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson acknowledged "obstacles" in energy trade but said it would continue without major disruption. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "minor" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be addressed primarily through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi has access to all parties, the nation does not possess the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the conflict," the analyst noted. "Aside from urging negotiations, its capacity to make a difference is limited."

In the end, notwithstanding the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is fundamentally one of "pure realpolitik," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.